Q1 2025 food recalls in the EU and UK, highlighting aflatoxins, Salmonella, and milk allergens as top safety risks.

Q1 2025 EU Food Recall Trends Reveal Key Safety Risks: Aflatoxins, Salmonella, Milk Allergens

📅 July 2025 | QMS4 News | Regulatory Trends & Food Safety Insights

In the first quarter of 2025, EU and UK regulators recorded a total of 1,242 food and beverage product recalls, marking a 14.5% decrease from the record-breaking 1,452 recalls in Q4 2024. While the decline offers a glimpse of progress, the numbers also reveal persistent and evolving challenges across the food safety landscape.


Top Recall Triggers: Contaminants Still Dominate

🧪 1. Non-Bacterial Contamination550 recalls

Despite a decrease from 609 in Q4, non-bacterial contaminants—including chemical and physical hazards—remain the leading cause of product recalls.
🔬 Aflatoxins topped the list of contaminants, contributing to 135 recall events, highlighting ongoing risks in categories like nuts, grains, and dried produce.

🦠 2. Bacterial Contamination237 recalls

This category showed a decline from 275 in the previous quarter.
🔥 Salmonella was the primary bacterial culprit, responsible for 174 recalls, emphasizing the need for stricter hygiene controls and thermal process validation.

⚠️ 3. Undeclared Allergens94 recalls

Food allergens continue to be a significant concern, particularly for vulnerable populations.
🥛 Milk was the most frequently undeclared allergen, cited in 19 recalls, signaling gaps in label verification and cross-contact prevention.


Most Affected Product Categories

Category Q1 2025 Recalls Q4 2024 Recalls
Fruits & Vegetables 270 309
Nuts, Nut Products & Seeds 150 159
Poultry Meat & Poultry Products 101 N/A

Fresh produce and plant-based ingredients continue to lead in recall volume, partly due to their vulnerability to contamination and minimal processing steps.


What This Means for Food Businesses

While the reduction in total recalls is encouraging, the quality and safety risks are far from resolved. The recurrence of specific hazards—such as aflatoxins, Salmonella, and undeclared milk—indicates systemic weaknesses in:

  • Supplier controls and verification

  • Allergen management programs

  • Environmental monitoring and sanitation


QMS4 Takeaway

“Recall data isn’t just a statistic—it’s a warning system. Every trend in contamination or mislabeling should trigger internal reviews of preventive controls, supplier quality agreements, and documentation practices.”


Action Points for QA/QC & Regulatory Teams

  • 📂 Review your HACCP and FSVP plans for relevance and completeness.

  • 🔄 Conduct refresher training on allergen control and labeling accuracy.

  • 🧾 Audit your suppliers more frequently—especially in high-risk categories.

  • 🧪 Increase environmental testing and product sampling for biological and chemical hazards.


Stay Ahead of Recalls

Want to receive GMP insights ?

📩 [Subscribe to the QMS4 Newsletter] — your partner in proactive quality management for food, pharma, and supply chain professionals.

Source: Data sourced from Sedgwick’s Recall Index, Q1 2025. For more details, visit Sedgwick’s website

Want more insights like this?

👉 Connect with me on LinkedIn for weekly tips on GMP, audits, and quality careers.

🔗 Subscribe to Newsletter (Quality Career and GMP Insights) | 🔗 Follow QMS4 | 🔗 Connect with Lokman

FDA Warning Letter issued to Indian pharmaceutical manufacturer Healwell Homeo for GMP violations including insanitary conditions and QA failures.

Shocking GMP Breaches in FDA Warning Letter to Indian Drug Facility: Are You at Risk Too?

🛑 FDA Warning Letter

When the FDA finds live rodents, birds, mold, and stray dogs inside a drug manufacturing site, it’s not just a local scandal — it’s a serious global signal.

In June 2025, the FDA issued a warning letter to Healwell Homeo Private Ltd., India, exposing a staggering breakdown in GMP:

  • No pest control

  • No component identity testing

  • No active Quality Unit oversight

  • And no response to FDA 483 — until products were detained at the U.S. border

This isn’t just a story about one site. It’s a wake-up call to every QA professional, auditor, and operations leader:

“If it can happen there, could it happen where you work?”

Let’s break down what the FDA found — and what you should verify today in your own QMS.


🚨 What Went Wrong?

1. Insanitary Conditions That Shock the System

The FDA found:

  • Live rodents, birds, and insects inside drug storage and manufacturing areas

  • Rodent droppings and bird feathers contaminating packaging and open equipment areas

  • Black mold-like substance on ceilings and near open tanks

  • Dogs near open entryways, with only a soiled cloth acting as a barrier

  • Manufacturing water ((b)(4)) stored in dirty drums outdoors

🔎 QMS Insight:
This is a textbook example of GMP collapse in environmental control. The facility failed even at the most basic hygiene level — the kind that should be addressed by facility design and routine pest control SOPs.


2. No Identity Testing of Incoming Materials

  • Components were used without identity testing

  • Certificates of Analysis (CoAs) from suppliers were accepted blindly — no verification

  • A critical component labeled as “(b)(4)” was used as-is, without testing or confirmation of its identity

  • No established quarantine, approval, or release procedures for incoming materials

📌 GMP Reminder:

Relying solely on vendor CoAs without establishing their reliability is a direct violation of 21 CFR 211.84(d).


3. Nonfunctional Quality Unit (QU)

FDA noted:

  • No written procedures for key functions: cleaning, deviations, training, labeling, etc.

  • No validation of equipment or process controls

  • No cleaning validation

  • Poor documentation of batch production

  • Sampling and test methods lacked SOPs

💥 This is not just a documentation issue — it reflects absence of QA governance.


📉 Impact and Regulatory Outcome:

  • Products were recalled from the U.S. market by the distributor in April 2025

  • FDA placed the company on Import Alert 66-40 — banning further imports

  • Healwell did not respond to FDA 483 observations until after border detention

  • FDA may withhold approval of any future applications listing this site


📌 What GMP Professionals Can Learn from This:

✅ Facility Hygiene Checklist:

  • Is your pest control program active, monitored, and reviewed?

  • Are all storage and production zones secure from contamination sources?

  • Do you perform periodic deep cleaning and mold checks in manufacturing areas?

✅ Material Management Audit Tip:

  • Do you test every incoming material for identity — even if a CoA is provided?

  • Have you validated your supplier’s CoA reliability through documented revalidation?

✅ Quality Unit Self-Check:

  • Does QA review and approve every deviation, complaint, and investigation?

  • Is your QU empowered to stop production if standards aren’t met?

  • Are your validation, training, and cleaning programs backed by SOPs and records?


QMS4 Reflection:

This isn’t just a non-compliance case — it’s a leadership and systems failure. The Quality Unit wasn’t just weak, it was absent. Facilities weren’t just unclean, they were hazardous. And worst of all? Silence in response — a missed opportunity to improve and collaborate.

📬 Want more breakdowns like this every week? Subscribe to the QMS4 Watch – the newsletter that goes beyond headlines and into the habits that protect your license, your patients, and your professional reputation.


Take Action Now: Is Your Site One FDA Letter Away?

Use this checklist as a real-time audit prompt — for you, your team, or your next internal walkthrough.


🧼 1. Facility Hygiene & Pest Control

☐ Are all storage and manufacturing areas free of droppings, insects, or mold?
☐ Do you have documented pest control records — with corrective actions?
☐ Are your water and raw materials stored in clean, closed, and monitored containers?
☐ Do you perform routine deep cleans and surface swab testing (where appropriate)?


🔍 2. Material & Component Testing

☐ Is identity testing performed on every lot of incoming components — no exceptions?
☐ Do you rely on CoAs without verifying supplier reliability?
☐ Do you have a formal supplier qualification and requalification program?
☐ Are materials placed in quarantine until released by QA?


🛡 3. Quality Unit Authority & Oversight

☐ Can your Quality Unit (QU) stop production if procedures aren’t followed?
☐ Does QA own investigations, batch release, complaints, deviations, and change control?
☐ Are SOPs in place for all GMP-critical processes (cleaning, sampling, training, validation)?
☐ Do your batch records document every critical step with traceability?


🔄 4. Validation & Control State

☐ Has your site performed PPQ for every marketed product?
☐ Are intra- and inter-batch trends monitored and reviewed by QA?
☐ Is your process validation strategy aligned with lifecycle expectations (ICH Q8-Q10)?
☐ Do you qualify all new and existing equipment before use?


💡 Final Thought — The QMS4 Way:

“Every warning letter is a mirror. The question is: do you see yourself — and do you act before the FDA knocks?”

Don’t wait for a 483. Use these reflections in your next:

  • Internal audit

  • QA team meeting

  • Supplier qualification

  • Annual GMP training

The full FDA Warning Letter to this Indian manufacturer is available on the official FDA website.

EPC revises pharmaceutical water standards — Water for Injections now tested using TOC method, effective July 2026.

EPC Revises Pharmaceutical Water Standards — A Step Towards Global Harmonisation

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) has adopted three revised texts on pharmaceutical waters, marking a major advancement in harmonising global quality standards — especially for sterilised Water for Injections.

🔍 Key Updates:

  • Water for Injections (0169): TOC test replaces oxidisable substances test, enabling better detection of organic impurities.

  • Purified Water (0008): Revised as part of harmonisation efforts.

  • TOC Test (2.2.44): Reagents replaced with Chemical Reference Substances for streamlined testing.

🧫 These changes reflect a shift toward modern analytical methods and reinforce the robustness of pharmaceutical water quality control. The revisions were adopted in June 2025 and will be published in Ph. Eur. Issue 12.3 (Jan 2026), becoming effective on 1 July 2026.

🤝 The updates are aligned with harmonisation efforts involving India, Japan, and the US through the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group.

👉 Click here to read the full details and regulatory context

Glass containers for pharmaceutical use — revised Ph. Eur. Chapter 3.2.1 published in Pharmeuropa 37.3, open for public consultation.

Revised Chapter on Glass Containers Published in Pharmeuropa 37.3

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) has published a major revision of general chapter 3.2.1: Glass containers for pharmaceutical use in Pharmeuropa 37.3.
This is the first significant update since 2019 and was led by the Glass (GLS) Working Party.

Key highlights include:

  • 🔍 Clarified testing purposes for hydrolytic resistance (Tests A, B, and C), addressing frequent user questions.

  • 💡 Modernised spectral transmission test for coloured glass, now based on wall thickness rather than container volume or closure type.

📣 The revised chapter is open for public consultation until end of September 2025. Stakeholders are encouraged to review and provide feedback.

👉 Click here to view the news link and comment instructions

Illustration of pharmaceutical water system testing with TOC and conductivity meters, referencing USP Chapter draft revision for public comment.

USP Revises Chapter <1231> on Pharmaceutical Water — Draft Open for Comment

USP has published a revised draft of Chapter <1231> “Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes” in PF 51(4). Updates clarify ozone limits, online TOC/conductivity testing, additive risk assessments, and new nitrosamine guidance.

USP Revises Chapter <1231> on Pharmaceutical Water — Draft Open for CommentThe draft is open for public comment until 30 September 2025 on the Pharmacopeial Forum website. Free registration is required.

Illustration showing pharmaceutical documentation, data integrity, and USP Chapter draft open for public comment until 30 September 2025

USP Publishes Draft Chapter <1029> on Good Documentation Guidelines and Data Integrity – — Draft Open for Comment

The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) has released a draft of Chapter <1029> titled “Good Documentation Guidelines and Data Integrity” for public comment in the USP Pharmacopeial Forum as of early July 2025. The draft revises the 2018 version and incorporates expanded guidance on documentation practices and data integrity.

Stakeholders can submit comments until 30 September 2025 after registering on the Pharmacopeial Forum website – link.

EU GMP guidelines update illustration showing compliance, digital systems, AI, and documentation with consultation open until 7 October 2025

EU GMP Guidelines Update: Drafts of Annex 11, Annex 22, and Chapter 4 Released – — Draft Open for Comment

On 7 July 2025, the European Commission released draft revisions to EU GMP Chapter 4 (Documentation), Annex 11 (Computerised Systems), and the new Annex 22 (Artificial Intelligence) for public consultation. These updates aim to align GMP standards with advances in digital systems, AI, and documentation practices.

🔍 Who Should Participate
Public health stakeholders, including GMP manufacturers, importers, and quality professionals, should review and contribute feedback.

📢 How to Submit Feedback
Stakeholder organizations should gather comments from members, compile them, and submit through the EU Survey tool.

🗓 Consultation Period

  • Start: 7 July 2025

  • Deadline: 7 October 2025, 23:59 (CEST)

🔗 Link: Click Here